Letters are not favors, formalities, or credentialing rituals. The judgment in a letter puts Trust on the line. The judgment in a letter puts Credibility on the line.
← Back to Office Hours & Student Information
A real letter is a vouching, "I have seen this student work, and I am willing to underwrite what I saw." That is not paperwork. That is exposure. I am telling a reader that my judgment is good collateral for yours.
Because of that, I will not underwrite claims I have not seen evidence for. I will not vouch for character, work ethic, judgment, or promise as a courtesy.
If I underwrite it, I underwrite it fully. If I cannot vouch for you, I will not write.
Excellent letters require a strong match between student, professor, evidence, and opportunity.
I am best positioned to write for students who have taken serious economics courses with me, written substantial work, participated thoughtfully in office hours or discussion, worked as TAs or research assistants, or shown unusual independence, judgment, resilience, seriousness, or intellectual courage.
Observed WorkSpecific Evidence
My strongest letters are not about whether you were nice, polite, or present. They are about how you think, argue, recover, revise, write, and work when the answer is not obvious and the praise is not immediate.
Do I believe you are a good-faith actor? What do you do when no one is watching? What do you say and write when you are anonymous?
JudgmentTenacity
If the opportunity needs someone to explain how you reason, work, improve, and take responsibility for serious intellectual tasks, I may be a good fit. If it only needs someone to certify that you are pleasant or in good standing, I am probably not the best use of the letter slot.
Matching Problem
A decorative letter helps nobody. Readers know when a letter is thin. A weak, vague, or inflated letter does not merely fail to help. It tells the reader the recommender did not have much to say.
No OrnamentNo Inflation
Grades matter. They are not the whole story. Serious letters live beyond the transcript.
Character matters a lot more than your GPA. Recent research identifies broad occupational personality requirements such as intellectual tenacity and social adjustment: persistence, initiative, analytical thinking, independence, emotional regulation, cooperation, concern for others, and stress tolerance. These are the kinds of traits serious letters try to document when there is real evidence for them.
“Excellent student” is cheap if it floats free of evidence. “I watched this student do this hard thing, under these conditions, in this way” is different. That is what makes a letter believable.
You are choosing a recommender. I am deciding whether I can serve as one honestly. This is a matching problem. A bad match produces a bad letter. I am not going to write you a bad letter.
Not every request calls for the same kind of response. A recommendation letter is underwriting. A basic reference is confirmation.
A recommendation letter is a written argument on your behalf. It requires evidence, judgment, care, and time. It should add something a transcript, resume, or form cannot provide. It is a written stake and invstment in your future performance.
ArgumentEvidence
A basic reference just confirms a fact: you took the class, you showed up, you did fine. That doesn't require my underwriting. It requires my contact information. You took a class, performed well, worked responsibly, or are in good standing. Some campus roles and routine applications need only that. If so, provide my contact information rather than asking for a letter.
ReferenceLighter Touch
Do not send a vague “Can you write me a letter?” email. That is not a serious request.
Include the opportunity name, deadline, purpose, and why it is worth a serious faculty letter.
Explain what I can truthfully say about you that another recommender could not say as well.
All requests must include two samples of assignments you wrote for me, or correspondence you had with me. These must be original versions, not post-graded GPT-polished versions. I reserve the right to attach student work to the letter so readers can corroborate what I say.
Include the correct links, deadlines, and submission instructions. If there are more than four separate websites, reduce the list before asking or explain why the situation is unusual.
Remind me of the courses, assignments, office-hour conversations, TA work, research work, or other evidence that should inform the letter. Do not assume I will remember every detail from a large class.
I write letters in bits and chunks while thinking about your work. The more time I have, the better the letter can be. Last-minute requests are usually not possible.
This is not a punishment. It is a standard.
If I do not know you, I cannot write a meaningful personal letter. At best I can describe the class and report how you performed. That is not much more than your transcript already does.
I generally do not write full personal letters for residential life, Take Five, e5, study abroad, student organizations, tour guides, peer advising, and similar non-graduate-school or non-professional requests. If someone needs a basic academic reference, provide my contact information.
Some opportunities do not merit a full faculty recommendation. If the letter is mostly credential inflation, a low-value hoop, or an attempt to make ordinary campus participation look more selective than it is, I may decline.
If the opportunity does not genuinely require a substantive letter, or if the application is already decided by objective criteria, I may decline rather than manufacture unnecessary prose.
If your transfer request is motivated solely by rankings, I am not likely to write the letter. Transfer letters for students I do not know well will not be written and will be lower priority than letters for students committed to the academic mission here.
I will not vouch for work ethic, character, cooperation, leadership, judgment, or resilience unless I have consistent and confirmed evidence to underwrite the claim. I will not write things merely because they would be nice for you to have in the file.
The limit exists to protect the letter.
A strong letter requires attention. I need to think about the student, the work, the opportunity, the evidence, the claims I can make, and the claims I cannot make.
If I am spending that time creating accounts, filling out duplicate rating grids, re-entering the same institutional details, and clicking through twelve portals, I am not spending that time thinking about your work. That makes the letter worse. I am not going to make letters worse.
For that reason, I will submit to a maximum of four total websites for a student unless we have discussed an unusual situation in advance. If a site asks for extensive survey responses that duplicate what is already in the letter, I may answer “N/A.” If a site asks me to judge issues I cannot legitimately assess, I will not make those claims.
Maximum Four WebsitesNo Repetitive SurveysQuality Control
Not all requests are equal. I will treat them accordingly.
Priority in letter writing will be given to Economics majors, serious graduate-school and professional opportunities, and requests connected to the academic mission of the University. Other requests may be declined even when they are not unreasonable in the abstract.
If I say yes, I am underwriting you. If I say no, it's because I don't have the evidence to vouch for what you're asking me to vouch for.
I will write only when I can write with specific evidence and believably on behalf of good-faith actors.
If I say no, it is because the evidence, match, timing, opportunity, or administrative burden does not support the kind of letter a student should want written on their behalf.