Definition
Are the disputed terms defined in a way their actual defenders would recognize?
Field Guide
Economic demonology is not simply error, disagreement, or criticism of markets. It is a recognizable method of evading economic argument by replacing analysis with a morally loaded caricature.
Are the disputed terms defined in a way their actual defenders would recognize?
Does the author explain how the alleged cause produces the alleged result?
Compared with what real alternative—not with an imaginary world containing no scarcity, politics, error, or abuse?
Are imperfect markets compared with imperfect governments and other feasible arrangements?
Has the author read and quoted the people or traditions being indicted?
The discipline
“This argument conflates self-interest and selfishness” is demonstrable. “This author is evil” is not. Precision is not softness; it is what makes the indictment survive contact with an intelligent opponent.